← Back to all case studies
Case study 06/ USA · Wellness & home services

Cutting cost per lead for US home services — 40% lower, through segmentation and testing.

Client
Wellness & home services businesses (names withheld)
Market
United States
Industry
Wellness · home services
Engagement
Consulting · lead generation
Goal
More leads for the same budget
Methods
Audience segmentation · A/B testing
Cost per lead (CPL)−40%after segmentation and testing
Business modelLeadsservice businesses, not e-commerce
MethodA/Bstructured testing of ads
01

Client overview

Zali Digital managed and optimized lead-generation campaigns for service-based businesses in wellness and home services across the United States. These businesses sell appointments and jobs, not products — so the number that matters is how much each qualified lead costs.

02

The challenge

Lead generation for local services fails in predictable ways:

a

One audience for everyone. Broad targeting mixes real prospects with people who will never book.

b

Untested ads. Without structured testing, the same weak message keeps running.

c

Rising cost per lead. Both problems push the cost of every inquiry up.

03

Business objectives

→

Lower the cost per lead.

→

Improve lead quality by reaching the right households.

→

Build a testing process that keeps improving results.

04

Our strategy

Segment precisely

Audiences split so each segment received a message that fit its need.

Test, don’t guess

A/B testing applied to ads to find what drives inquiries.

Scale what wins

Budget moved to the segments and ads with the lowest CPL.

05

Execution

Audience segmentation

Precise segments replaced broad targeting.

A/B testing

Structured tests on ad creative and messaging to lift ad performance and conversion rates.

Campaign management

Ongoing optimization of live lead-generation campaigns across the USA.

CPL tracking

Cost per lead used as the decision metric for every change.

06

Results & growth

−40%Cost per lead (CPL)
+

Cost per lead fell by 40%.

+

The same budget now buys roughly 1.67× as many leads.

+

A repeatable test-and-scale process the businesses can keep running.

Cost per lead, indexed to the starting level (lower is better)
100Before60 (−40%)After

Illustration: shows the size of the reported change only. It is not an ad-account screenshot or dashboard.

Results are from a consulting engagement across several service businesses; names and account screenshots are not published. “1.67× as many leads” is arithmetic from the −40% CPL at a constant budget.

07

Key growth drivers

1

Precise segmentation. Spend stopped going to people who would never book.

2

Structured A/B testing. Winning messages were proven, not guessed.

3

One decision metric. Every change was judged on cost per lead.

08

Final takeaway

"In lead generation, cheaper leads come from talking to fewer, better-matched people — and testing your way to the message that makes them call."

Leads drying up in your own account? The guide to why Meta ads stop generating leads walks through what to check first.